SPONSOR LINKS
spacer

PRINT ADS

spacer

TOP HOMES

HomeSeller
Top Homes


 Home > News > Story

Published - Wednesday, August 20, 2008

POST COMMENT | READ COMMENTS (5 comment(s))

Westby school board discusses cell phone policy

   Advertisement   
Advertise Info. Website Directory
.
It was a lost call for members of the Westby Area School Board of Education when they began discussing how to adopt a new state policy regarding cell phones and other video capable recording devices in locker rooms during its monthly meeting on Aug. 11.

The conversation left the locker room and expanded to all aspects of school grounds regarding who, what, when and where should cell phones be allowed; what to do with them if they are confiscated; who should be permitted to use them on school grounds; and at what point do you say it’s okay or enough is enough when it comes to the use of electronic devices on school grounds.

As cell phone technology advances invasion of privacy concerns are readily increasing for businesses and legislators as they work to combat the negative impact illegally recorded messages and published photographs have on employees and private individuals. The same concerns are now under review in public school systems where many students are in the possession of cell phones and have the capability to illegally photograph or record private conversations of fellow students.

On April, 4, 2007 the Wisconsin Association of School Boards passed Assembly Bill 8, requiring any person who operates a locker room in the state of Wisconsin to adopt a written policy that specifies who may enter and remain in a locker room to interview or seek information from individuals located in the locker room.

The policy also must outline what recording devices, if any, and under what circumstances those devices can be used in a locker room. It must clearly state that no person may use a cell phone to capture, record or transfer a representation of a partially nude person in the locker room and in such action must reflect the privacy of those individuals. The policy is designed to protect students under the age or 18.

Westby administration developed and presented a makeshift policy to the board last week, but after reviewing the policy board members and administration, questioned the verbiage and suggested reformating the policy to more clearly state the provisions before the October 1 implementation deadline.

The original policy would not have allowed anyone, including administration, coaches or the district athletic director from entering the locker room to interview or seek information from students while they were in the locker room. Administrator Mike Murphy and school board representatives Dennis Havlik and Bob Kerska, both felt changing the verbiage to allowing authorized personnel inside the locker room would better serve the district.

Havlik and Kerska both threw up red flags regarding the cell phone verbiage in the policy as it pertains to use of the devices in the locker room. Kerska leaned toward not allowing cell phones in the locker room at all, while Havlik felt the verbiage restricting any cameras and recording devices from any locker room setting should include cell phones, which are capable of both.

Although the following statement in the proposed policy specified cell phones restrictions, Havlik felt the preceding verbiage needed revisions to reduce any confusion down the line in the event an unusual circumstance arose.

The conversation split as administration discussed current concerns they deal with on a daily basis with students who fail to place their cell phones in their hall lockers and continue to carry the devices into classroom settings. High School Principal Ken Manning informed the board that administration will be cracking down on cell phones violations this year, but insisted that policing all the students who carry a cell phone would be difficult, if not impossible, to say the least.

According to current school policy students with cell phones, electronic pagers or any other two-way communication devices must not have them on their possession during school hours and the devices must be shut off and stored in their lockers.

The devices may be used before and after school and during the lunch hour, outside of the school district buildings. Anyone caught in violation of this policy may have the device confiscated and not returned to them until the end of the current school week and all confiscated devices are held by administration for a minimum of two days.

The new locker room policy will be added to the current electronic device policy already in place in the district. Prior to the September 8 monthly meeting, the school board will receive a revised version of the locker room policy from administration to review and approve before the mandatory October 1 deadline.

The school board will hold its annual meeting on August 25 at 8 p.m. in the high school cafeteria. The budget will be approved during the annual meeting.
.
   Advertisement   
 Tell us what you think...

 Comments »

Cell PhoneCamera Policy - Its simple really...... wrote on Sep 2, 2008 2:46 PM:

" Cell phones, cameras, video recorders, etc. should NOT be allowed in a locker room. It's just that simple. Cell phones/blackberries, etc. should not be allowed in classes and should only be allowed to be used during breaks, lunch, etc. If caught with a phone during class or at another unacceptable time or place the phone should be confiscated for 2 or 3 weeks, maybe for good depending on the situation. Consequences for an unacceptable action - what a fine way to raise a generation! Seems like it is hard for the school board to make a decision; see above - wordsmith it a bit and then print! "

The Goal wrote on Aug 25, 2008 1:52 PM:

" Why don't we just give kids the keys to the family car when they enter junior high school? After all, they probably will eventually need to learn to drive, so they might as well learn now and make their own mistakes. Ok.. Granted.. a car is definitely not a cell phone, but the point is... you just can't give kids technology, give them free rein and hope that they use it wisely..with no guidelines OR repercussions. I thought that's what we as adults are supposed to do. Give kids guidelines and boundaries to allow them to grow up and make wise decisions. YES, it is ok if they learn there are consequences to making bad decisions and hurting others. No, some of us won't be here to see them use the technology.

That is why we have to get out of this terrible.. "no personal responsibility for anything" mode that we're in. Sometimes it seems the people that are teaching this are just plain lazy and don't want to make the effort to guide kids. This apathy comes with a very high price. We can't have that mind set if we truly care what the future holds. "

What is the goal wrote on Aug 23, 2008 4:12 PM:

" What is this really about? Do we want to punish kids for using the technology that is an extension of who they are or teach them the values to make ethical decisions when using that technology? Cell phones are the tip of the iceberg!

Kids are digital natives...adults are digital imigrants. We must prepare kids to lead in a world we will not see. If we don't give them the 21st Century skills they need, we cannot begin to hope they will be ready for this daunting but exciting future. "

Are You Kidding Me wrote on Aug 22, 2008 7:46 AM:

" As if growing up isn't stressful enough, now the kids get to worry about having pictures taken while they're in the locker room? The device in question is held for a week? How about keeping it permanently and further consequences? Losing the device for 2 days to a week is nothing. How about the kids who are humiliated? That could follow them for years to come.

Kids are fast losing every place that they can feel safe. There is absolutely no reason that cell phones need to be on the premises either... or were those of us who made it completely through school without one deprived? "

Consequences wrote on Aug 21, 2008 12:43 PM:

" Are there going to be consequences to violations of the rules listed? For example, what if a student took a picture of a naked or partially naked fellow student and began showing those pictures around to other students? What types of consequences would there be for something that could be totally humilitating to that student? "


PLEASE NOTE: Comments on stories that frequently update through the day disappear with each update.
The comments above are from readers. In no way do they represent the views of the Westby Times.

Click here to report offensive or inappropriate comments. Please identify the comment you're concerned about, the story to which the comment was attached, the date of the comment and the person who made the post.

 Post a comment (150 word limit) »

Log In - If you have already signed up with The Westby Times, please sign in now!
*Member ID:
*Password:
  Forgot Your Password?
 
Sign Up - To encourage intelligent and meaningful conversation, The Westby Times requires all commenters to register before posting comments. It's quick, it's easy, and it's free! Just fill in the information below to get started!

**Your Member ID and password will be required to log in. Your comments will appear under your user name.

Do not use usernames or passwords from your financial accounts!

Note: Fields marked with an asterisk (*) are required!

*Create a Member ID:
*Choose a password:
*Re-enter password:
*E-mail Address:
*Year of Birth:
 

(children under 13 cannot register)

*First Name:
*Last Name:
Company:
Home Phone:
Business Phone:
*Address:
*City:
*State:
*Zip Code:
 

About Us | Advertise Online | Contact Us | Disclaimer | F.A.Q. | Privacy Policy | Requests | RSS | Webmaster | Website Directory
Copyright © 2009 The Westby Times. All rights reserved.
Material from this site may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or distributed. A Lee Enterprises subsidiary.